Engineering documentation and aerial data acquisition performed as part of the Atizapán–Atlacomulco Highway monitoring program.
33Visual conducted aerial data acquisition activities at the Los Gallos front, located near KM 27+100 of the Atizapán–Atlacomulco Highway project.
Field verification was completed before launch, including operating conditions, GNSS availability, the reference system, control-point visibility and the planned flight parameters.
During pre-flight review, the Above Sea Level altitude reference was corrected. The revised mission settings were verified before data acquisition began at 09:51.
The mission documented the following project front during the reporting period.
Linear-route aerial acquisition performed to document current project conditions and support engineering review.
Before commencement of the mission, the crew confirmed the assigned project front, operating schedule, flight height, equipment condition and access requirements. Weather, operational restrictions and the available RTK/PPK source were reviewed.
The coordinate reference system and height type were verified, and the visibility of available ground-control points and checkpoints was confirmed. During this review, the mission's Above Sea Level reference was corrected before launch.
The linear-route mission began at 09:51. Visual line of sight and a secure operating perimeter were maintained while RTK/GNSS status was monitored. Mission information and field observations were recorded as part of the contemporaneous field checklist.
Key field activities documented during the mission.
Access, weather, flight equipment, GNSS conditions, control points and mission parameters were reviewed.
The ASL value was corrected and the updated mission settings were verified before launch.
Linear-route acquisition began at the KM 27+100 Los Gallos project front.
The Above Sea Level value was corrected before the mission was launched.
The recorded coordinate reference system and height type were verified rather than assumed from file or system labels.
Summary metrics should be populated from the corresponding MissionQC report after processing.
Insert the mission-specific QA interpretation here. Note any spacing, GNSS, RTK, shutter, exposure or height-profile observations and explain whether they affected the completeness or usability of the acquired data.
Final outputs associated with this mission should be listed only after production and quality review have been completed.
The following supporting files provide the technical record behind this mission summary.