Immersive VR Tour
The Realsee version is strongest as an immersive walkthrough. It gives the viewer a clean way to move through the subject, understand the space, and experience the object from selected scan positions.
This example shows the difference between a Realsee/Galois capture designed for immersive navigation and an FJD Trion P2 capture processed as an early 3D Gaussian Splat proof of concept. Both are useful, but they serve different purposes.
The Realsee version is strongest as an immersive walkthrough. It gives the viewer a clean way to move through the subject, understand the space, and experience the object from selected scan positions.
The FJD Trion P2 scan was done quickly as a proof of concept to test whether the capture could support a 3D Gaussian Splat workflow. The point cloud was excellent, and the visual result was promising, but more passes and stronger camera overlap would improve the final splat.
This caboose is a useful comparison because it makes the workflow difference clear. Realsee/Galois is better for immersive tour presentation. The FJD P2 capture is better suited for point cloud acquisition and testing a 3DGS-style reconstruction workflow. For polished exterior models, the result depends less on a single device and more on capture discipline: overlap, exposure, distance, height variation, and repeated passes.