☰
33VISUAL / AERIAL INTELLIGENCE

AT-AT · Calibration control and recovery pilot

ICA + HYCSA · 121 control vertices · 12 source groups · 15 October 2026

Purpose of this page

This page brings together the client-supplied ICA and HYCSA GNSS calibration and survey control data for the Atizapán–Atlacomulco project. It helps the team understand the relationship between UTM and project coordinates (planas), locate control vertices along the corridor, and plan which points to recover and independently verify in the field.

The goal is to develop reliable reference points for checking photogrammetry and establishing repeatable RTK flight-base setups. The map and shortlist guide that work; they do not certify the points or demonstrate that a photogrammetric model is accurate.

Assumed CRS: WGS84 / UTM zone 14N. Colored markers identify calibration control vertices; circles are ICA and squares are HYCSA; physical marker / mojonera types remain unverified. Gold rings identify provisional recovery candidates. Drawing chainage anchors are separate from control vertices.

Executive summary

Inventory: 121 distinct control vertices—54 ICA and 67 HYCSA—kept as separate, filterable datasets. WGS84 / UTM 14N is assumed for the map; original UTM and planas remain separate coordinate fields.

Findings: the six HYCSA CSVs form 70 complete coordinate pairs. Three repeated IDs agree within rounding; no ICA/HYCSA matching IDs, labels or coordinates within 1 m were found. ICA vertex 3155 retains its 24.84 mm discrepancy. Seven T3 points extend beyond the useful reference-line endpoint, limiting interpretation of their corridor distance.

Heights: ICA supplies none. HYCSA supplies 57 nonzero source Z values of unspecified vertical datum; 10 zero values are treated as unavailable. Source heights are not validated checkpoint or base elevations.

Action: start with four ICA core recoveries around KM30–39, then four ICA and six HYCSA extensions; investigate 3155 separately. All 15 shortlist entries remain provisional. The criteria below must be verified before checkpoint or RTK-base use.

Preparing the map and embedded data…
Control inventory mapICA + HYCSA · satellite and map views · chainage · recovery candidates

Provisional recovery shortlist

This is a proposed field-recovery plan, not a list of approved checkpoints or base stations. Begin with ICA vertices 3217, 3210, 3186 and 3185 around KM30–39. If those recoveries are useful, expand to four more ICA points and six HYCSA points in the Santa Clara and T3 areas, planned as separate visits. Investigate vertex 3155 separately because its two workbook UTM entries differ by 24.84 mm. Candidates were selected for geographic spread, shared calibration membership and proximity to the drawing—not confirmed access, monument stability, sky visibility or survey accuracy. Every point must be recovered, identified and independently surveyed before its intended role is accepted.

Dataset / vertex ID / project labelPilot roleApproximate areaSelection reason / limitation

ICA · MI20-8-2
ExtensionKM20 areaSouthern extension; relatively near reference.

ICA · MI25-9-2
ExtensionKM25 areaNear reference; shared CAL2/CAL3 control.

ICA · GPSI32-9-4
Core pilotKM32 areaNear reference; shared CAL4/CAL5 control; candidate for a repeatable temporary base setup if sky and stability permit.

ICA · MI30-6-1
Core pilotKM30–31 areaNear reference; shared CAL4/CAL5 control. Pair with 3210 for a southern pilot cluster.

ICA · BN-38
Core pilotKM38 areaShared CAL6/CAL7 control; BN label makes a benchmark record worth requesting, but does not establish a height.

ICA · GPSI38-23-1
Core pilotKM38–39 areaNear reference; shared CAL6/CAL7 control; pair with 3186 for a northern pilot cluster.

ICA · MI42-5-4
ExtensionKM42 areaNear reference in CAL8; verify scope of the Loma Alta antenna-height note.

ICA · MD46.15.1
Discrepancy investigationKM46 area by project labelResolve 24.84 mm UTM discrepancy between CAL8 and CAL9 before assigning any reference role.

ICA · MI49.21.3
ExtensionKM49 areaNear reference in CAL9; extends geographic coverage.

HYCSA · PA658
HYCSA extensionNear drawing KM58+000Near reference in Santa Clara 1; source Z exists but its vertical datum and accuracy require independent verification.

HYCSA · PA64-84
HYCSA extensionNear drawing KM64+820Shared by both Santa Clara lists with identical coordinates; candidate for a repeatability check, not an independently validated benchmark.

HYCSA · GPSI65.45A
HYCSA extensionNear drawing KM65+380Near reference; named control with nonzero source Z. Confirm physical identity and height reference.

HYCSA · BN68-2
HYCSA extensionNear drawing KM68+480Northern Santa Clara extension with nonzero source Z; BN name does not establish benchmark status.

HYCSA · M113
HYCSA extensionNear drawing KM95+580T3 candidate close to reference and away from the trace endpoint; confirm M113 label and source height datum.

HYCSA · V127
HYCSA extensionNear drawing KM93+420T3 extension at V127; close to reference with nonzero source Z; no validated height or site suitability.

Before accepting a recovered point

For any role: confirm the exact vertex and marker with the survey crew, photograph and inspect it, establish safe access, obtain its survey record and independently verify XYZ, uncertainty, coordinate frame, epoch and height reference. Resolve the UTM / planas calibration. Workbook coordinates alone do not establish approved control.

As a checkpoint: identify the exact surveyed center in multiple images, or independently survey a visible nearby target. Withhold checkpoints from model adjustment and calibration; validate their reference coordinates independently of the flight-base solution. Distribute checks across the area and evaluate against the intended deliverable accuracy.

As a temporary RTK base: verify stability, centering, sky visibility and multipath; establish an accepted geodetic position including ellipsoidal height; document antenna height and reference point; check correction coverage and separate control, and retain raw observations. Do not enter planas as the geodetic base position.

The ICA workbook provides no point elevations. HYCSA source Z values have an unspecified vertical datum; zero Z values are unavailable. No permanent CORS installation site is approved by this shortlist.

FIELD METHODOLOGY / REACH RS2+

Recover, observe, solve, verify

Establish a defensible reference position for each recovered control using the Emlid Reach RS2+ and NRCan CSRS-PPP. Recovering a physical mark and accepting its coordinates are separate decisions. This is the proposed project protocol; the durations below are planning targets, not service guarantees or proof of accuracy.

Primary occupationPlan 6–8 continuous hours on the first visit, in good sky conditions. Do not move or recenter the receiver during the session.

Independent repeatPlan 4–6 continuous hours on another day where practical, with a different time window. Remove and reinstall the equipment, recenter, remeasure height and process the new log separately.

Higher-confidence anchorConsider an 8–24-hour session at a secure, stable site when the required uncertainty, geometry or first result warrants it. Longer logging does not repair a disturbed mark, multipath, wrong antenna information or an unsuitable site.

One receiver, realistic schedulingFour core points at 10–14 hours each require approximately 40–56 receiver-hours, excluding reconnaissance, setup, travel and office checks. Start with one or two anchors, review the results, then extend the campaign. One RS2+ cannot occupy two marks simultaneously.

Emlid advises at least four hours for PPP and allows longer sessions according to the accuracy needed. The 6–8-hour initial and 4–6-hour repeat targets are our conservative pilot planning choices. See Emlid’s PPP logging guidance.

1 · Prepare the recovery visit

Take the point’s dataset, vertex ID, project label, source UTM/planas, approximate map location and discrepancy notes. Request the original monument record and photographs. Obtain access, assess construction activity and traffic, and agree the horizontal/vertical accuracy targets and decision criteria for its intended role before surveying. Check battery, storage, tripod/tribrach, centering optics, level calibration, tape and weather protection.

Keep the original coordinate files unchanged. Record the mark name exactly; a nearby nail, painted target or replacement monument is a different point until its relationship is surveyed. For 3155, retain both source entries and resolve the discrepancy through observations rather than selecting whichever matches best.

2 · Recover and document the physical mark

Confirm identity with the survey crew. Photograph the inscription and precise survey center, a close view with scale, the approach, four horizon directions and the final antenna setup. Describe material, cracking, looseness, settlement, construction risk and obstructions. Record an access sketch and measured ties to stable features. A BN/GPS/RT/PA label alone does not establish monument type or stability. If identity is uncertain or the mark is damaged, record unconfirmed / unsuitable and stop its acceptance process.

3 · Set up the RS2+ and verify antenna height

Use a stable tripod/tribrach or properly braced setup, precisely centered and leveled over the identified center. Avoid vehicles, fences, metal roofs, reflective surfaces and growing obstructions. Measure the vertical distance from the survey center to the receiver’s bottom antenna reference point, following the selected Emlid logging workflow. Record the actual value, units, reference point and measurement method. Check centering, level and height before and after the session; investigate any movement or height change instead of averaging it away.

Set the actual point name and measured height in the RINEX logging information. Preserve receiver model, serial number and firmware, plus antenna/radome identification. Verify the exported RINEX antenna fields and height against the field sheet. Confirm which physical point the final PPP coordinates refer to. Do not add or subtract 0.134 m by habit: the project’s CAL8 note is not a universal correction, and antenna-model offsets must not be applied twice. See Emlid’s antenna-height conventions.

4 · Log an uninterrupted static session

Use Emlid Flow’s appropriate CSRS-PPP logging preset/settings and a RINEX version supported by the service; Emlid recommends RINEX 3.03 when unsure, subject to service support. Enable UBX backup. Use a 1 Hz raw archive as the project default where supported; retain all available tracked constellations and dual-frequency observations. CSRS-PPP uses its supported signals; do not strip the original archive to match an older processing recipe.

Confirm that recording has actually started and file size/elapsed time are increasing. Note start/end times with time system explicitly identified, horizon conditions, interruptions, receiver resets, weather and nearby activity. Use a stable external-power arrangement if needed and secure the site. End logging normally, wait for the file to close, download it, verify its duration and make a second copy before clearing receiver storage. Do not treat the displayed real-time position, FIX badge or a short SINGLE average as the accepted PPP reference. Emlid logging and export instructions.

5 · Process with the Canadian CSRS-PPP service

Inspect the RINEX before submission: actual epochs, data gaps, observation types, approximate location, antenna model/radome and antenna height. Submit each occupation separately in static mode to NRCan CSRS-PPP, using its international ITRF output for the Mexico project. Confirm the returned realization, coordinate epoch and height convention in the report; do not relabel the output as generic WGS84 or as planas.

For project acceptance, review a Rapid-product result and reprocess with Final products when available. An Ultra-rapid result can be an early diagnostic. NRCan currently reports Rapid availability 17–18 hours after the observation day ends and Final availability 12–15 days after the week ends; product availability can change. Save the report, summary, position files, submission settings and exact RINEX submitted. Record the product type actually used. NRCan product, reference-frame and output documentation.

6 · Review quality and compare independent sessions

Review reported uncertainties and their confidence level, convergence, data completeness, residuals, rejected observations and antenna warnings. Short, noisy or poorly converged sessions remain on hold. A processing-success email or small formal sigma is not an independent accuracy test. A split of one long file can expose instability, but is not a replacement for a separate setup and occupation.

Compare the independent solutions as east, north, horizontal magnitude and ellipsoidal-height differences in a common reference realization and epoch. Compare Rapid and Final results, and investigate disagreements larger than the pre-agreed project tolerance or inconsistent with the reported uncertainties. Do not average solutions across unresolved shifts. Where feasible, check against independently established control or a verified CORS solution; separate occupations reduce repeatability risk but can still share antenna-model, frame and environmental biases.

Keep a geodetic master record with XYZ or latitude/longitude/ellipsoidal height, realization, epoch, antenna convention and uncertainty. Separately document the transformation to the project’s coordinate system. An inverse/forward UTM projection alone does not perform a reference-frame or epoch transformation. Do not convert PPP ellipsoidal heights into construction elevations without an accepted vertical reference/geoid relationship. The workbook’s assumed WGS84 and HYCSA source Z values remain unverified until reconciled.

7 · Accept a specific role, then use the point

Checkpoint: require a stable, unambiguous, image-identifiable center or a separately surveyed visible target. Keep it out of the photogrammetric adjustment. Its coordinate uncertainty must support the intended validation accuracy, with an independent reference check so a shared flight-base error cannot be hidden.

Temporary RTK base: require repeatable centering, adequate sky and correction coverage, accepted geodetic coordinates and the documented antenna-height convention. Recheck height on every setup; use the correct reference point in Emlid Flow and the drone workflow, log raw data throughout the flight and verify a separate check mark. With one RS2+, complete the checkpoint occupations beforehand or use a separate independently referenced survey arrangement; the receiver cannot be both local base and roaming checkpoint rover at the same time.

Permanent CORS: a recovered point may support local ties and checks, but permanent-site stability, sky, power, security, communications and long-term monitoring require a separate design and commissioning exercise. PPP acceptance of one occupation does not commission a CORS.

An optional differential-static cross-check can use RS2+ and verified reference-station observations in Emlid Studio: local observations in Static receiver, reference observations in Base, with overlapping data, navigation, authoritative reference coordinates and correct antenna heights. Review session behavior rather than only the single best epoch. Emlid static-processing workflow.

Field record and acceptance gates

StageEvidence to retainDecision
RecoveredID, mark-center photo, condition, horizon views, access sketch and survey-crew confirmationConfirmed identity / unconfirmed / unsuitable
ObservedIndependent session IDs; actual duration; RINEX + UBX; receiver and antenna metadata; measured heights before/after; centering checks and field notesComplete / reobserve
SolvedCSRS-PPP reports and product type; realization and epoch; height convention; uncertainty and session comparisonsProvisional / hold / independently checked
Accepted for useAgreed tolerances; reference and vertical-system reconciliation; independent evidence; reviewer, date and explicit intended roleCheckpoint / temporary base / withheld; CORS approval is separate

Methodology prepared 18 October 2026. Session durations are planning allowances, not certified accuracy classes or a substitute for the project survey specification. Retain raw observations and processing history; revise the plan when field conditions or results require it.

Full analysis, coordinate evidence and limitations

Data and field files

Downloads are generated from data embedded in this block. Keep the QGIS project and its GeoJSON layers in the same folder. Basemaps require an internet connection.